Wikipedia defines Racial Profiling this way:
Racial profiling is the inclusion of racial or ethnic characteristics in determining whether a person is considered likely to commit a particular type of crime or an illegal act or to behave in a "predictable" manner. It is often confused with the more comprehensive Offender Profiling. Toward the end of the 20th century in the United States, the practice became controversial among the general public as the potential for abuse by law enforcement came to light.
Civil rights advocates are against the use of racial profiling tactics by the police.
Our good buddies at The American Criminal Liberties (oops- sorry!) Make that the American Civil Liberties Union. Their claims are to " represent individuals who have been victims of racial profiling by airlines, police, and government agencies, and our present work also encompasses major initiatives in public education...Our advocacy also includes lobbying for the passage of data collection and anti-profiling legislation and litigation of egregious airline and highway profiling cases. "
And from the DNC's own website- "Democrats will fight to end discrimination based on race, sex, ethnicity, national origin, language, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, and disability in every corner of our country, because that's the America we believe in. We are committed to banning racial, ethnic, and religious profiling and requiring federal, state, and local enforcement agencies to take steps to eliminate the practice "
So, we've established the fact that liberals have a thing against judging people. Yes- the dems are a paragon of virtue when it comes to absolute tolerance. That is, if it is something they agree with. If it is a different idea, something with differing views and opinions that those of the liberal ideals- well! Can't have it. No way. Profiling to a liberal is wrong- UNLESS it is someone who's ideas and opinions are different than their "enlightened" ones.
Did you know that according to the Department of Homeland Security under the Obama administration, I am a terrorist threat?
That's right. Me. A obscure stay at home, homeschooling mom. Me. Wife. Mom. Sister. Plain ol' me. Never broke a law in my life- I am a homeland security threat according to The U.S. Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Office of Intelligence and Analysis, Extremism and Radicalization Branch .
You see- my ideas that the Bible is for real, that I trust and believe on Jesus Christ- my God for the way I try and live my life, and which forms my views on community, country and social ideas- it is dangerous! The fact that I am against illegal border crossing instead of coming into this country the proper and legal way makes me a bigot. Because I am against abortion and do not agree with homosexual marriage, because I believe in relationships the way that God intended- between a man and a woman that makes me a terrorist threat and a homophobe. Because I believe Jesus Christ is the Only Salvation, and the only Truth, the fact that I believe that some day soon, He is coming back, as written in the Bible Prophecies- that makes me a very dangerous person. Because I believe in the idea that the Government must adhere to a document that so many liberals believe is passe and non globalist and even imperialistic- you know, that living and breathing piece of paper called the CONSTITUTION! Because I believe that this document is the basis of our Government and Law- I am a bigot, white supremacist, racist, sexist, unpatriotic right wing fanatic which needs to be closely monitored. Oh thank God I'm not a war vet- or I'd really be in big trouble! You know, because according to the DHS, vets are loony- and only can be compared to the likes of Timothy McVeigh!
Yes- because I am a Constitutionally minded, Bible believing anti abortion, pro life, tea partying agreeing, pro family Christian- I am deserving to be labeled a terrorist threat by the Obama government.
No, I don't strap bombs to myself, nor have I any intention to behead anyone- but I am dangerous. I don't blow up or fly airplanes into buildings full of innocent people, and I have never proposed wiping any group of people off the face of the earth- but according to the liberal socialist government- I am dangerous.
My thoughts are different than theirs you see. I don't conform to their Utopian ideas and don't see the point in a dialogue with those who want to kill us. I don't conform to their christ- you know, the one who loves and tolerates everything. That guy who is one of many paths and a cool teacher from the old days. My Christ is the LORD, God the Son- all knowing Creator of the Universe and everything contained in it. I don't believe in their ideas that the world is slowly frying, and I actually think the Constitution is a model to live by. I happen to believe that we have a right in the first amendment to our religious beliefs, and to worship, the freedom of speech and the right to petition government when the people believe the government is not listening ( those pesky tea parties). I happen to believe in a persons right to bear arms. I happen to believe in all the rights afforded in the Constitution, which the Framers rightfully acknowledged come from our CREATOR.
If this makes me a danger to society- well, I don't see myself as dangerous.
What I see as dangerous- more dangerous than judging one by one's skin color, is to judge one's thoughts because they are different.
This is only the beginning people. Right now we are only considered possible threats. Some day soon, they, not unlike socialist, humanistic societies who came before, will round us all of us rabble rousing Bible believing Christians for some old fashioned re education.
When people are judged purely for their thoughts- you can bet they will not stop there.
Yes- I see this as another tool to prepare the world for the coming Antichirst- and a sure sign of Christian persecution coming.